Proteus,
I asked, "do you agree with Luther's attack against a canonical book of Scripture."
this was the answer you gave:
Correct me if I'm wrong. But haven't you and I discussed the canon of Scripture in the past and you said that the canonical books were selected by the Holy Spirit before they were even put in the Bible by the Catholic Church?
Now you say that the Epistle of James was not a canonical book by the 15th century during Luther's lifetime?
You're digging a deeper and deeper hole.
Sincerely,
De Maria
I asked, "do you agree with Luther's attack against a canonical book of Scripture."
this was the answer you gave:
My response was to your question as to whether i agreed with attacking the veracity of a canonical book of the Bible, in which i pointed out that what Luther attacked was not part of your infallible canon at the time, and that he had scholarly reasons for disallowing it as Scripture, ....
Correct me if I'm wrong. But haven't you and I discussed the canon of Scripture in the past and you said that the canonical books were selected by the Holy Spirit before they were even put in the Bible by the Catholic Church?
Now you say that the Epistle of James was not a canonical book by the 15th century during Luther's lifetime?
You're digging a deeper and deeper hole.
Sincerely,
De Maria
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for contributing.