Pages

Saturday, December 20, 2014

99% of which were Bishops of the Church



Calvin: 
Each one of these early church fathers spoke for scriptures only, not tradition. I will be happy to cite their quotes if a poster would like, it takes up much space to put all of these quotes now.
I'll take you up on the challenge. Lets go one Church Father at a time if you don't mind. That too much space stuff is just an excuse because you know that the Church Fathers had much to say about Tradition. And none of them ever said anything about Scirpture ALONE. Yes, they spoke about Scripture, but they never denied Tradition.

I actually edited the OP to add some.
Thanks. I'll debunk those below.

Therefore scriptures only is not a new invention 
Yes, it is a new invention. Protestants invented it. 

Calvin: 
I have heard many catholic posters here make this claim:
"Sola Scriptura is an invention of 16th century Protestants."
That is correct, I'm one of them.

I even have read this:
"The irony is that the principle by which the Reformers sought to return to the purity of the early Church was itself unknown to the early Church. The idea of sola Scriptura was an invention of the sixteenth century. No Father or council of the early Church ever asserted that the Scriptures, in and of themselves, with-out any reference to the Church, are the all-sufficient rule of faith. The Reformation principle of sola Scriptura was an invention of the Reformation itself. ... This means that from the Day of Pentecost to October 31, 1517-a span of approximately 1488 years-the kind of theology which Protestantism exalts as being "authentic" could not have existed. In other words, the early Church, to which the Reformers theoretically wanted to return, had a theology quite different from that of the Reformers." (THE WAY: What Every Protestant Should Know About the Orthodox Church, Clark Carlton, 1997, p 91)

So this to me is saying Protestants invented it.
Absolutely!

However upon further reading I have seen this:
.... the earliest apostolic Fathers clearly taught Sola Scriptura.
That's wrong.

The Bible and Apostolic Fathers taught it.
Here, let me show you what the Bible teaches:

1 Timothy 3:15

King James Version (KJV)

15 But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.

Hebrews 13:17

King James Version (KJV)

17 Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that is unprofitable for you.

2 Thessalonians 2:15

King James Version (KJV)

15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.

Please, now its your turn, show me where Scripture says to believe Scripture alone.

Calvin
Then between 200 AD and 1500 AD, there was a gradual move towards the adoption of human creeds and traditions. By the time Luther came along, the Roman Catholic church had become so tradition bound, that the church barely resembled the one you can read about in the Bible. Luther simply restored the concept found in the Bible that scripture overthrows all traditions. For Catholic and Orthodox defenders to say sola Scriptura was invented in the 16th century, is as historically dishonest as it is wishful thinking.
Ok. Lets go one at a time. Here's what these Church Fathers said about Tradition.


180 AD: Irenaeus

Irenaeus
For even creation reveals Him who formed it, and the very work made suggests Him who made it, and the world manifests Him who ordered it. The Universal [Catholic] Church, moreover, through the whole world, has received this tradition from the Apostles (Against Heresies 2:9 [A.D. 189]).

True knowledge is the doctrine of the Apostles, and the ancient constitution of the Church throughout all the world, and the distinctive manifestation of the body of Christ according to the successions of the bishops, by which they have handed down that Church which exists in every place, and has come even unto us, being guarded and preserved, without any forging of Scriptures, by a very complete system of doctrine, and neither addition nor curtailment [in truths which she believes]; and [it consists in] reading [the Word of God] without falsification, and a lawful and diligent exposition in harmony with the Scriptures, both without danger and without blasphemy… (ibid.4:33 [A.D. 189]).

180 AD: Clement of Alexandria
Here St. Clement speaks of the preeminence of St. Peter. Protestants say that is a tradition.


Clement of Alexandria
[T]he blessed Peter, the chosen, the preeminent, the first among the disciples, for whom alone with himself the Savior paid the tribute [Matt. 17:27], quickly grasped and understood their meaning. And what does he say? "Behold, we have left all and have followed you" [Matt. 19:2 7, Mark 10:28] (Who is the Rich Man That is Saved? 21:3-5 [A.D. 200]).

200 AD: Tertullian

Tertullian
For wherever both the true Christian rule and faith shall be shown to be, there will be the true Scriptures, and the true expositions, of all the true Christian traditions (The Prescription Against Heretics 19 [A.D. 200]).


200 AD: Hippolytus
Here, Hyppolytus explains the priesthood, which Protestants say is a tradition not in Scripture. Where did he get it from?

Hippolytus
When a deacon is to be ordained, he is chosen after the fashion of those things said above, the bishop alone in like manner imposing his hands upon him as we have prescribed. In the ordaining of a deacon, this is the reason why the bishop alone is to impose his hands upon him: He is not ordained to the priesthood, but to serve the bishop and to fulfill the bishop's command. He has no part in the council of the clergy, but is to attend to his own duties and is to acquaint the bishop with such matters as are needful. . . . On a presbyter [priest], however, let the presbyters impose their hands because of the common and like Spirit of the clergy. Even so, the presbyter has only the power to receive [the Spirit], and not the power to give [the Spirit]. That is why a presbyter does not ordain the clergy; for at the ordaining of a presbyter, he but seals while the bishop ordains. (Apostolic Tradition 9 [ca. A.D. 215]).

250 AD: Cyprian
Here, St. Cyprian speaks of the Church as immaculate and calls the Sacraments divine. Where did he get that?


Cyprian
The spouse of Christ cannot be defiled; she is uncorrupted and chaste. She knows one home . . . Does anyone believe that this unity which comes from divine strength, which is closely connected with the divine sacraments, can be broken asunder in the Church and be separated by the divisions of colliding wills? He who does not hold this unity, does not hold the law of God, does not hold the faith of the Father and the Son, does not hold life and salvation (On the Unity of the Catholic Church6 [A.D. 251]).

325 AD: Athanasius

Athanasius
Without prefixing Consulate, month, and day, [the Fathers] wrote concerning Easter, "It seemed good as follows," for it did then seem good that there should be a general compliance; but about the faith they wrote not, "It seemed good" but, "Thus believes the Catholic Church"; and thereupon they confessed how they believed, in order to show that their own sentiments were not novel, but Apostolic; and what they wrote down was no discovery of theirs, but is the same as was taught by the Apostles (Letter on the Councils of Ariminum and Seleucia [A.D. 359]).


350 AD: Hilary of Poitiers
Here, St. Hilary proclaims the doctrine of ever virgin Mary and denies that Mary had any children besides Christ. Where did he get that?
Hilary of Poitiers
If they [the brethren of the Lord] had been Mary's sons and not those taken from Joseph's former marriage, she would never have been given over in the moment of the passion [crucifixion] to the apostle John as his mother, the Lord saying to each, "Woman, behold your son," and to John, "Behold your mother" [John 19:26-27], as he bequeathed filial love to a disciple as a consolation to the one desolate (Commentary on Matthew 1:4 [A.D. 354]).


360 AD: Cyril of Jerusalem
Here, St. Cyril calls St. Peter the CHIEF of the Apostles and the keeper of the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven. Protestants say that is a tradition.

Cyril of Jerusalem
In the power of the same Holy Spirit, Peter, both the chief of the apostles and the keeper of the keys of the kingdom of heaven, in the name of Christ healed Aeneas the paralytic at Lydda, which is now called Diospolis [Acts 9 ;3 2-3 4] (Catechetical Lectures 17;27 [A.D. 350]).

370 AD: Basil

Basil
Of the beliefs and practices whether generally accepted or publicly enjoined which are preserved in the Church some we possess derived from written teaching; others we have received delivered to us "in mystery" by the tradition of the Apostles; and both of these in relation to true religion have the same force. And these no one will contradict; - no one, at all events, who is even moderately versed in the institutions of the Church. For were we to attempt to reject such customs as have no written authority, on the ground that the importance they possess is small, we should unintentionally injure the Gospel in these matters… (On the Holy Spirit 27 [A.D. 375]).

375 AD: Gregory of Nyssa

400 AD: Jerome

Jerome
Don’t you know that the laying on of hands after baptism and then the invocation of the Holy Sirit is a custom of the Churches? Do you demand Scripture proof? You may find it in the Acts of the Apostles. And even if it did not rest on the authority of Scripture the consensus of the whole world in this respect would have the force of a command. For many other observances of the Churches, which are do to tradition, have acquired the authority of the written law (The Dialogue Against the Luciferians 8 [A.D. 382]).


405 AD: John Chrysostom

John Chrysostom
"So then brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which you were taught, whether by word, or by epistle of ours" (2 Thessalonians 2:15). Hence it is manifest, that they did not deliver all things by epistle, but many things also unwritten, and in like manner both the one and the other are worthy of credit. Therefore let us think the tradition of the Church also worthy of credit. It is a tradition, seek no farther (Homilies on Second Thessalonians [circa A.D. 400]).


425 AD: Augustine
Here St. Augustine speaks of the primacy of Peter. Protestants say that is a tradition.

Augustine
Among these [apostles] Peter alone almost everywhere deserved to represent the whole Church. Because of that representation of the Church, which only he bore, he deserved to hear "I will give to you the keys of the kingdom of heaven" (Sermons 295:2 [A.D. 411]).


425 AD: John Cassian
Here St. John says that Mary is the Mother of God. Protestants say that is a tradition.John Cassian
You cannot then help admitting that the grace comes from God. It is God, then, who has given it. But it has been given by our Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore the Lord Jesus Christ is God. But if he is God, as he certainly is, then she who bore God is the Mother of God (On the Incarnation of Christ Against Nestorius 2:2 [A.D. 429]).


450 AD: Theodoret

Theodoret
I have ever kept the faith of the Apostles undefiled… So have I learnt not only from the Apostles and the Prophets but also from the interpreters of their writings, Ignatius, Eustathius, Athanasius, Basil, Gregory, John, and the rest of the lights of the world; and before these from the holy Fathers in council at Nicaea, whose confession of the faith I preserve in its integrity, like an ancestral inheritance [styling corrupt and enemies of the truth all who dare to transgress its decrees] (Letters no. 89 [circa A.D. 443]).



CalvinEach one of these early church fathers below spoke for scriptures only, not tradition.
"the sacred and inspired Scriptures are sufficient to declare the truth" (Athanasius, Against the Heathen, part 1, 1, 3)
Lets get some context:
Part 1

1. The knowledge of our religion and of the truth of things is independently manifest rather than in need ofhuman teachers, for almost day by day it asserts itself by facts, and manifests itself brighter than the sun by the doctrine of Christ. 2. Still, as you nevertheless desire to hear about it, Macarius , come let us as we may be able set forth a few points of the faith of Christ: able though you are to find it out from the divine oracles, but yet generously desiring to hear from others as well. 3. For although the sacred andinspired Scriptures are sufficient to declare the truth—while there are other works of our blessed teachers compiled for this purpose, if he meet with which a man will gain some knowledge of the interpretation of the Scriptures, and be able to learn what he wishes to know—still, as we have not at present in our hands the compositions of our teachers, we must communicate in writing to you what we learned from them—the faith, namely, of Christ the Saviour; lest any should hold cheap the doctrine taught among us, or thinkfaith. in Christ unreasonable.....

Where does that say, Scripture alone? Where does it deny the value of the Teachers passing down the faith?


Calvin:
Here's another: 
There is, brethren, one God, the knowledge of whom we gain from the Holy Scriptures, and from no other source. For just as a man, if he wishes to be skilled in the wisdom of this world, will find himself unable to get at it in any other way than by mastering the dogmas of philosophers, so all of us who wish to practice piety will be unable to learn its practice from any other quarter than the oracles of God. Whatever things, then, the Holy Scripture declare, at these let us look; and whatsoever things they teach, these let us learn; and as the Father wills our belief to be, let us believe; and as He wills the Son to be glorified, let us glorify Him; and as He wills the Holy Spirit to be bestowed, let us receive Him. Not according to our own will, nor according to our own mind, nor yet as using violently those things which are given by God, but even as He has chosen to teach them by the Holy Scriptures, so let us discern them." (Hippolytus, Against Noetus, ch 9)
Let's get more context, below:

2. Now they seek to exhibit the foundation for their dogma by citing the word in the lawI am the God of your fathers: you shall have no other gods beside me; and again in another passage, I am the first,He says, and the last; and beside me there is none other. Thus they say they prove that God is one. And then they answer in this manner: If therefore I acknowledge Christ to be God, He is the Father Himself, if He is indeed God; and Christ suffered, being Himself God; and consequently the Father suffered, for He was the Father Himself. But the case stands not thus; for the Scriptures do not set forth the matter in this manner.....3. In this way, then, they choose to set forth these things, and they make use only of one class of passages; just in the same one-sided manner that Theodotus employed when he sought to provethatChrist was a mere man…..

Above, he explains how heretics use Scripture alone to falsify the Word of God.  So, if he was teaching Scripture alone, why would he show how heretics twist Scripture?


4. Let us, as I said, see how he is confuted, and then let us set forth the truth. Now he quotes the words,Egypt has laboured, and the merchandise of Ethiopia and the Sabeans, and so forth on to the words,For You are the God of Israel, the Saviour. And these words he cites without understanding what precedes them. For whenever they wish to attempt anything underhand, they mutilate the Scriptures.

And then in the end, after showing how they mutilate the Scriptures because they ignore the tradition, he gives the remedy:….

17. These testimonies are sufficient for the believing who study truth, and the unbelieving credit no testimony. For the Holy Spirit, indeed, in the person of the apostles, has testified to this, saying, And who has believed our report? Therefore let us not prove ourselves unbelieving, lest the word spoken be fulfilled in us. Let us believe then, dear brethren, according to the tradition of the apostles, that God the Wordcame down from heaven, (and entered) into the holyVirginMary, in order that, taking the flesh from her, and assuming also a human, by which I mean a rationalsoul, and becoming thus all that man is with the exception of sin, He might save fallen man, and confer immortality on men who believe in His name.


So, he shows you that the true reading of Scripture is in line with the Sacred Tradition passed down by the Apostles.  Read the words in red above.  Therefore, he is not teaching the Protestant doctrine of Scripture alone.


Calvin
Don't you know that the laying on of hands after baptism and then the invocation of the Holy Spirit is a custom of the Churches? Do you demand Scripture proof? You may find it in the Acts of the Apostles. And even if it did not rest on the authority of Scripture the consensus of the whole world in this respect would have the force of a command. For many other observances of the Churches, which are due to tradition, have acquired the authority of the written law, as for instance the practice of dipping the head three times in the layer, and then, after leaving the water, of tasting mingled milk and honey in representation of infancy; and, again, the practices of standing up in worship on the Lord's day, and ceasing from fasting every Pentecost; and there are many other unwritten practices which have won their place through reason and custom. So you see we follow the practice of the Church, although it may be clear that a person was baptized before the Spirit was invoked." (Jerome, Dialogue Against the Luciferians, 8)
Really? He says in there to follow the Tradition. So what is your point?

For many other observances of the Churches, which are due to tradition, have acquired the authority of the written law

Calvin
What then? After all these efforts were they tired? Did they leave off? Not at all. They are charging me with innovation, and base their charge on my confession of three hypostases, and blame me for asserting one Goodness, one Power, one Godhead. In this they are not wide of the truth, for I do so assert. Their complaint is that their custom does not accept this, and that Scripture does not agree. What is my reply? I do not consider it fair that the custom which obtains among them should be regarded as a law and rule of orthodoxy. If custom is to be taken in proof of what is right, then it is certainly competent for me to put forward on my side the custom which obtains here. If they reject this, we are clearly not bound to follow them. Therefore let God-inspired Scripture decide between us; and on whichever side be found doctrines in harmony with the word of God, in favour of that side will be cast the vote of truth." (Basil, Letter 189, 3)
??? Didn't you understand what he said?

If custom is to be taken in proof of what is right, then it is certainly competent for me to put forward on my side the custom which obtains here.

He is teaching Scripture AND Tradition. Not Scripture alone.


Calvin..of course there are other examples....
There are none.

Therefore, if it was written by the early church fathers of the RCC....how could it have been a protestant invention?
It was not written by the Early Church Fathers. It was invented by the Protestants.

I do not see how the 2 reconcile. Clearly the Protestants did not "invent " but rather went back to the teachings of these early church fathers.
The Protestants invented it and then some tried to justify it by taking certain ECF teachings out of context. 

Thoughts?
A bunch of them.

First, didn't you ever wonder how the ECF's, 99% of which were Bishops of the Church, who commanded authority over their flocks, 99% of which were also priests, who believed in faith AND WORKS, celebrated the Mass and all the Sacraments of the Catholic Church, and taught the doctrines of Purgatory, Marian doctrines, prayer to the Saints and virtually everything that Protestants have discarded, didn't you wonder how they could believe all these things and still somehow believe in the Protestant doctrine of Scripture alone?

You didn't think it through very well did you?

Sincerely,

De Maria

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thanks for contributing.