Godismyjudge said...
Hi De Maria,
Well, this is moreso my just going over what the Fathers had to say in favor of the Pope. But they never did teach Papal infalability. So I guess my point in this post was this statement:
"I didn’t find anything in the Fathers that explicitly taught Papal infallibly or got into ex cathedra vs. non-ex cathedra statements by Popes. So right off the bat I would say the Fathers were not Roman Catholic. "
At least, one Roman Catholic apologist wasn't able to produce such evidence from the Fathers.
God be with you,
Dan
De Maria said...
Well, let's start with Scripture, if you don't mind.
Matthew 16:18-19
King James Version (KJV)
18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. 19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
To me, that sounds as though Christ has just assured St. Peter, that when the Church begins its ministry, Christ will give him the charism of infallibility.
1. Tell me why you think this is a wrong interpretation.
2. If you still disagree with my interpretation, please explain why your interpretation should carry more weight than mine.
Sincerely,
De Maria
Matthew 16:18-19
King James Version (KJV)
18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. 19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
To me, that sounds as though Christ has just assured St. Peter, that when the Church begins its ministry, Christ will give him the charism of infallibility.
1. Tell me why you think this is a wrong interpretation.
2. If you still disagree with my interpretation, please explain why your interpretation should carry more weight than mine.
Sincerely,
De Maria
Funny that many things that protest-ants believe are NOT explicitly implied but they will believe them do to their own version of interpretation.
ReplyDeleteBut what I find beyond confusing, is when something IS EXPLICITLY IMPLIED in the Scriptures, suddenly a protest-ant can't see it. LOL!
I know. Its sort of frustrating when they do that. All we can do is laugh.
DeleteAnother thing for Godismyjudge to think about: At the end of the Gospel of John, why did Christ tell Peter to be the Shepherd of all, when many of the other Apostles were present and sitting next to Chirst when He spoke these words: "Feed my sheep." and then commanded Peter to "follow Me."?
ReplyDeleteNo other Apostles were so commanded.
God Bless