Anonymous said...
Scripture does not need to say "there would be a time when it would be the sole infallible authority."
Anonymous also said:
Any teaching that contradicts Scripture or that Scripture does not address is not binding.
Therefore, since Scripture does not say, "there would be a time when it would be the sole infallible authority", this doctrine is not binding. It is a false doctrine of men.
This does not in the least change the idea that the Scripture alone is inspired-inerrant Word of God.
Again, produce the teaching from Scripture or by your own rule, it is invalid.
It follows from the necessity of the case that something that is inspired-inerrant by definition is the highest authority in the church. This is based on the nature of the Scripture itself.
Scripture says that the highest authority is God. And Scripture says that God established the Church as authority over men in this life.
Did the apostles consider anything else to be inspired-inerrant Word of God?
God, the Church and His Traditions.
Scripture does not need to say "there would be a time when it would be the sole infallible authority."
Anonymous also said:
Any teaching that contradicts Scripture or that Scripture does not address is not binding.
Therefore, since Scripture does not say, "there would be a time when it would be the sole infallible authority", this doctrine is not binding. It is a false doctrine of men.
This does not in the least change the idea that the Scripture alone is inspired-inerrant Word of God.
Again, produce the teaching from Scripture or by your own rule, it is invalid.
It follows from the necessity of the case that something that is inspired-inerrant by definition is the highest authority in the church. This is based on the nature of the Scripture itself.
Scripture says that the highest authority is God. And Scripture says that God established the Church as authority over men in this life.
Did the apostles consider anything else to be inspired-inerrant Word of God?
God, the Church and His Traditions.