Saturday, October 31, 2015

Catholic Answers needs your help!


This is the last chance to help Catholic Answers forums - we still need to raise $52,613

Catholic Answers Forums is the largest catholic online forum in the world. It provides a community for people seeking to learn more about God and the faith, that they may come to love Jesus more and serve their neighbor with truth and charity.

Less than 1% of the community donate. That’s why we’re writing to you for your help. If you can help, please do and get an opportunity to receive free gifts for yourself or to share with a friend.

Receive up to 3 Free Gifts


We'd like to send you several special thank yous if you can support the Forums by making a monthly donation of $18 or more (or a one-time gift of $200 or more), including:
  • The Glory of the Crusades—A powerful book in which historian Steve Weidenkopf debunks the numerous myths about the Crusades that our secular culture uses as clubs to attack the Church
  • The Protestant’s Dilemma—An eye-opening book in which apologist Devin Rose shows over and over again how the premises on which Protestantism is based lead to absurd conclusions
And for a one-time gift of $500, we will give you the above PLUS:
Also, you will be entered into a drawing for a FREE iPad Mini that comes with hours of Catholic Answers material.

We know that you value Catholic Answers Forums and all the good they do.

The Forums reach people all over the world with the gospel and many new people are joining them every day, so please
 CLICK HERE TO HELP SUPPORT THE FORUMS AND BRING MORE SOULS TO CHRIST.

Thank you for your generosity.
 
The Catholic Answers Forums Team

P.S. You need to donate by midnight November 2 to be entered into the drawing for the iPad, CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE SO YOU HELP PEOPLE AND WIN AT THE SAME TIME!

Trick or Treat!

Praying to dead saints

Just my two cents. The Bible does not say anything about praying to “dead” saints.

The Bible simply commands the Saints in Christ to pray for “all” (1 Timothy 2:1). We don’t cease to become members of the Body of Christ when we die. Therefore, we don’t cease to pray when we die. If anything, our prayer becomes more perfect as we get closer to the source of our spiritual life (2 Corinthians 5:8).
The New Testament is a new dispensation in Christ. This is clearly expressed in the book of Hebrews. Where the Old Testament is described, it says:
Heb 12:18 For ye are not come unto the mount that might be touched, and that burned with fire, nor unto blackness, and darkness, and tempest, 19 And the sound of a trumpet, and the voice of words; which voice they that heard intreated that the word should not be spoken to them any more: 20 (For they could not endure that which was commanded, And if so much as a beast touch the mountain, it shall be stoned, or thrust through with a dart: 21 And so terrible was the sight, that Moses said, I exceedingly fear and quake:)
But the New Covenant in the name of Jesus Christ is totally different. We are living amongst our brethren. How can it be that we are not permitted to communicate with those amongst whom we live?
Heb 12:22 But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels, 23 To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect, 24 And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.
Christ is our example. And it is He who first portrayed the new dispensation of the communion of saints, when, still in the flesh, he climbed the Mountain of Tabor and spoke freely with Moses and Elijah in the company of Peter, James and John (Matthew 17:1-3).
Therefore, although the Bible does not give an explicit command to pray to dead saints. The New Testament teaches, by example and implication, that we who are born again in Christ are living in and amongst the saints upon Mount Sion. And since we are living amongst them, we are free to communicate with them.

Thursday, October 29, 2015

Join Scott Hahn

Dear Friends,
On Sunday, November 8, the St. Paul Center will be hosting a special evening at the beautiful University of St. Mary of the Lake Conference Center in Mundelein, IL. Join me for a social hour with cocktails and hors d'oeuvres followed by my keynote address. I’ll also provide an update on the St. Paul Center’s recent accomplishments and our exciting plans for the future. 

For more information
Call the St. Paul Center at 740.264.9535



Evening Reception and Keynote Address

Date:
Sunday, November 8th, 2015


Time:
7:00pm - 9:00pm

Venue:
University of St. Mary of the Lake Conference Center

Situated on the campus of University of St. Mary of the Lake in northern Chicago.

Individual Ticket for $50 Includes:
Social with Scott Hahn
Cocktail reception & 
Hors d'oeuvres
Keynote Address by Scott Hahn


FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT THE ST PAUL CENTER AT 740-264-9535 OR JONATHANMCGOVERN@STPAULCENTER.COM
TO 
SPONSOR THE EVENT CONTACT KENBALDWIN@STPAULCENTER.COM

If you are interested in supporting the mission of the St. Paul Center, but cannot attend the event, you can donate using the form below, and we'll send you a special free CD.
Thank you so much. We hope to see you soon!



There are rooms available through the conference center if you need accomadations for the evening.  Contact the conference center at 847-566-8290

LIMITED EDITION: OFFICIAL PAPAL VISIT COMMEMORATIVE BOOK



Forward
PrayerBeliefsIssuesMediaBibleStore


LIMITED EDITION: OFFICIAL PAPAL VISIT COMMEMORATIVE BOOK
List Price: $19.99
Product Code: 7-898
Order My Edition!
Don't forget to place your order for the official commemorative collection of photos and coverage of the papal visit. Order today to receive this special gift just in time for Christmas!

In Love Is Our Mission: Pope Francis in America, prepare to dive into a rich collection of photos, events, official addresses, and more, drawn from the work of Catholic News Service photographers and journalists. This resource serves as a great commemorative gift for the Christmas holiday and as a keepsake from the papal visit. 

Events covered include: the first historical address from the pope to both houses of Congress, the pope's meeting at the White House with President Barack Obama, a historical address to the United Nations, Mass at Madison Square Gardens in New York City, Philadelphia’s World Meeting of Families, and more!

Where is "purgatory" in the Bible?

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Analysis of a Conversion - Why I left the Catholic Church, other Catholics

Yes, other Catholics.

I've heard this one before from Protestants.   Many of us don't give a very good example of Christian living.

Look at the Kennedy's.  Our beloved President, John F. Kennedy, flaunting his affairs before the whole world.

Our Supreme Court is mostly Catholic.  Have they overturned Rowe vs Wade?  No.  If anything, they've solidified it.

Look at Mardi Gras.  That spectacle of debauchery was originally a Catholic holiday.  The same with St. Patrick's day.  A day when people use a Saint's name as an excuse to get publically intoxicated.

And, I know that many people who are not truly Catholic, still call themselves Catholic.  Myself, for example.  I was an atheist for many years.  But who wants anyone to know that they are atheist?  I didn't.  I certainly wanted it to be kept secret from my mother.  So, I told no one.  But I didn't believe in God and I hated the Church.  Yet if anyone were to ask me, "What are you?"  My reflex response would be, "Catholic."

And it was true for me, as well.  In the last article, I revealed that part of the reason I didn't like to attend the Mass is because there were very few Catholic men in the pews.  I was a boy who, like all other boys, yearned for the day that I would be a man.  And I wanted to do manly things.  From my point of view, men did not go to Church.

And this is related to that.  As a child, I noticed that lots of Catholics got drunk and happily committed and boasted about all the sins that the Priest preached against on Sundays.

What a joke!

So, at that age, my question to Catholics was, "Do you think I'm stupid?  You forbid me the things which you enjoy and boast about.  Do as I say, not as I do."  No sir, I wasn't going to be left out.  I was going to get mine.

What's the solution?

This is a tricky one, folks.  To tell you the truth, they're all tricky.  In the past articles, I said that "I was determined to give good example and I was determined to give reasons for my faith, etc."  But I can do nothing without God's grace.  Unless God builds it, the house can not be built.

There's only one solution to all our problems.  God.

Before my conversion, I tried many times to quit many bad habits and I always failed.  But when I felt the grace of God coursing through me, I didn't even have to try.  The bad habits were taken away from me.

But folks, no matter what Protestants say, we are not saved by grace alone.  If I had not accepted that grace and cooperated with it, there are many times when I could have fallen back into the same hole.

Ora et Labora

Prayer and work.  We have to pray and we have to work to accomplish that for which we pray.  And by the grace of God, if we are single minded in seeking Him and His grace, He will reward us and grant us success.





The three major objections to Scripture Alone which Protestants can't overcome

Tuesday, October 27, 2015

Paraphrasing the Summa: First part, Question 1, Article 8

Question 1: The nature and extent of sacred doctrine.

Is Christian doctrine revealed by God?  Does it teach us about the supernatural as well as the natural?

Article 8. Whether sacred doctrine is a matter of argument?

Can Christian doctrine be justified and defended logically?  Are there logical parameters by which Christian doctrine can be explained?
Objection 1. It seems this doctrine is not a matter of argument. For Ambrose says (De Fide 1): "Put arguments aside where faith is sought." But in this doctrinefaith especially is sought: "But these things are written that you may believe" (John 20:31). Therefore sacred doctrine is not a matter of argument.
Matters of faith should not be disputed.  They are simply to be accepted without argument.  Since Christian doctrine is a matter of faith, it is not a matter of argument.
Objection 2. Further, if it is a matter of argument, the argument is either from authority or from reason. If it is from authority, it seems unbefitting its dignity, for the proof from authority is the weakest form of proof. But if it is from reason, this is unbefitting its end, because, according to Gregory (Hom. 26), "faith has no merit in those things of which human reason brings its own experience." Therefore sacred doctrineis not a matter of argument.
On the other hand, if Christian doctrine is not to be accepted without question, then it must have substantial reasons for one to believe.  These reasons, if they are forced upon us by authority, are not true reasons and do not amount to evidence.  

But, if they can be comprehended by man's unaided reason and substantiated with purely human evidence, then they are not truly from God.

But since it is claimed that Christian doctrine is from God, then it is not a matter of argument.
On the contrary, The Scripture says that a bishop should "embrace that faithful word which is according to doctrine, that he may be able to exhort in sound doctrine and to convince the gainsayers" (Titus 1:9).
St. Thomas disagrees.  The Sacred Word says that those in authority, in the Church, should be masters of Christian doctrine in order that they can convince others of the truth which is therein taught. 
I answer that, As other sciences do not argue in proof of their principles, but argue from their principles to demonstrate other truths in these sciences:
Sciences, in general, do not substantiate their principles.  But their principles are presupposed.  However, from their presupposed principles, they demonstrate other truths. 
so this doctrine does not argue in proof of its principles, which are the articles of faith, but from them it goes on to prove something else; as the Apostle from the resurrection of Christ argues in proof of the general resurrection (1 Corinthians 15).
It is the same with Christian doctrine.  For example, the resurrection of our Lord is a principle which demonstrates the truth of our own resurrection on the Last Day. 
However, it is to be borne in mind, in regard to the philosophical sciences, that the inferior sciences neither prove their principles nor dispute with those who deny them, but leave this to a higher science; 
There are certain philosophies which hold presuppositions which can't be proved at all nor can their proponents defend them against those who reject them.  This, they leave to more advanced sciences.   
whereas the highest of them, viz. metaphysics, can dispute with one who denies its principles, if only the opponent will make some concession; but if he concede nothing, it can have no dispute with him, though it can answer his objections.
Now, the highest of these philosophies, is metaphysics (i.e. the study of reality or existence) consists of that which studies all being.  This philosophy can defend its principles if the objector accepts at least some metaphysical teachings.  But if he accepts none of them, then, there is nothing to dispute.
Hence Sacred Scripture, since it has no science above itself,
Christian doctrine is the highest of all sciences. 
can dispute with one who denies its principles only if the opponent admits some at least of the truths obtained through divine revelation;
And can defend its principles against an opponent which admits some of that which God has revealed to man.
thus we can argue with heretics from texts in Holy Writ, and against those who deny one article of faith, we can argue from another. 
So, Christian doctrine can be defended and substantiated with anyone who accepts the validity of Scripture. 
If our opponent believes nothing of divine revelation, there is no longer any means of proving the articles of faith by reasoning,but only of answering his objections — if he has any — against faith.
But not with those who do not admit the existence of God or the validity, at least in part, of Christian doctrine.  All we can do with those is explain the reasons for our faith. 
Since faith rests upon infallible truth, and since the contrary of a truth can never be demonstrated, it is clear that the arguments brought against faith cannot be demonstrations, but are difficulties that can be answered.
God is truth.  Faith in God rests upon His existence.  Denials of the existence of God do not amount to proof that God does not exist.  Therefore, arguments against faith in God are of no substance.  But we can respond to these arguments.
Reply to Objection 1. Although arguments from human reason cannot avail to prove what must be received on faith, nevertheless, this doctrine argues from articles of faith to other truths.
The first objection says that articles of faith must be accepted without argument.

St. Thomas does not deny this objection.  Because human reason is not enough to prove that which can not be understood by the unaided human mind.  None the less, Christian doctrine should be taught to all men in order that they might also come to faith.
Reply to Objection 2. This doctrine is especially based upon arguments from authority, inasmuch as its principles are obtained by revelation:
Christian doctrine comes from the very highest authority, God.  And it is passed down by those whom He appointed in authority to do so.
thus we ought to believe on the authority of those to whom the revelation has been made.
Thus, it is true that we ought to accept and believe without disputing. 
Nor does this take away from the dignity of this doctrine, for although the argument from authority based on human reason is the weakest, yet the argument from authority based on divine revelation is the strongest.
Although an "I say so" argument is of the weakest kind when it is made by a human.  Yet, God's say so (i.e. God's word) is the highest of arguments because it is based upon the greatest of wisdom. 
But sacred doctrine makes use even of human reason, not, indeed, to prove faith (for thereby the merit of faith would come to an end), but to make clear other things that are put forward in this doctrine.
Although unaided human reason can not grasp all articles of faith.  Yet, human logic can be used to clarify some of the truths taught in Christian doctrine. 
Since therefore grace does not destroy nature but perfects it, natural reason should minister to faith as the natural bent of the will ministers to charity.
God's love does not destroy man, but makes him more perfect.  Therefore, man should seek to attain faith as much as he seeks to attain love.
Hence the Apostle says: "Bringing into captivity every understanding unto the obedience of Christ" (2 Corinthians 10:5). Hence sacred doctrine makes use also of the authority of philosophers in those questions in which they were able to know the truth by natural reason, as Paul quotes a saying of Aratus: "As some also of your own poets said: For we are also His offspring" (Acts 17:28).
And, since faith is greater than human reason.  Then, human reason should be subordinate to faith and should obey the principles of faith.  Therefore, Christian doctrine uses all the truths discovered by natural reason and explained by human philosophers to support the truths revealed by God.  Because, as Scripture says, we are all God's children. 
Nevertheless, sacred doctrine makes use of these authorities as extrinsic and probable arguments; but properly uses the authority of the canonical Scriptures as an incontrovertible proof, and the authority of the doctors of the Church as one that may properly be used, yet merely as probable.
But Christian doctrine uses these proofs merely to support God's truths.  Not to prove them.  The only indisputable evidence we have to prove God's truth is from the Sacred Scriptures.  And the evidence presented by the Early Church Fathers can be used further support, but it is not indisputable.
For our faith rests upon the revelation made to the apostles and prophets who wrote the canonical books, and not on the revelations (if any such there are) made to other doctors. Hence Augustine says (Epis. ad Hieron. xix, 1): "Only those books of Scripture which are called canonical have I learned to hold in such honor as to believe their authors have not erred in any way in writing them. But other authors I so read as not to deem everything in their works to be true, merely on account of their having so thought and written, whatever may have been their holiness and learning."

Therefore, it is upon Sacred Scripture that we rely to prove the truth of Christian doctrine.  Not on any other books, no matter how holy the authors may be. 

*  Note:  Don't let this confuse you.  St. Thomas is not teaching Sola Scriptura.  Note that he refers to St. Augustine in the end of his explanation.  St. Thomas relies heavily upon St. Augustine's explanations.  And St. Augustine is famous for saying, "I would not accept even the Gospel, if not for the authority of the Catholic Church" (against manichaeus).

Here's more proof.  If you look at his "I answer that" section, where he speaks of "heretics".  The very word, "heretic" implies an authority which has the power to declare someone a heretic based upon their erroneous understanding of Christian doctrine.

Socrates vs Sola Scriptura

Sunday, October 25, 2015

Receive up to 3 Free Gifts

Catholic Answers Forums is a favorite resource among our audience. It provides information, companionship, and the chance to grow closer to God.

But it needs your help to stay online and keep helping people. Specifically: We need to raise $85,000.

That’s why we’re writing to you for your help.

Receive up to 3 Free Gifts


We'd like to send you several special thank yous if you can support the Forums by making a monthly donation of $18 or more (or a one-time gift of $200 or more), including:
  • The Glory of the Crusades—A powerful book in which historian Steve Weidenkopf debunks the numerous myths about the Crusades that our secular culture uses as clubs to attack the Church
  • The Protestant’s Dilemma—An eye-opening book in which apologist Devin Rose shows over and over again how the premises on which Protestantism is based lead to absurd conclusions
And for a one-time gift of $500, we will give you the above PLUS:
Also, you will be entered into a drawing for a FREE iPad Mini that comes with hours of Catholic Answers material.

We know that you value Catholic Answers Forums and all the good they do.

The Forums reach people all over the world with the gospel and many new people are joining them every day, so please
 CLICK HERE TO HELP SUPPORT THE FORUMS AND BRING MORE SOULS TO CHRIST.

Thank you for your generosity.
 
The Catholic Answers Forums Team

P.S. You need to donate by midnight November 2 to be entered into the drawing for the iPad, CLICK HERE TO LEARN MORE SO YOU HELP PEOPLE AND WIN AT THE SAME TIME!