Saturday, June 6, 2015

Baptism is the vehicle through which God washes our sins away by water


FH:How is an infant changed? Please, enlighten us all....
It is the work of God. There are somethings which are God's domain. Do you claim to know how Jesus raised men from the dead and healed people of illness. If you can explain that mystery, then you already know how God changes the infant in Baptism.

Seems you forget that the change comes PRIOR to baptism....
No. It is you who forget that God takes into account the faith of the parent. Let me show you:

Here, Jesus healed one based upon his own personal faith:
Luke 18:42
And Jesus said unto him, Receive thy sight: thy faith hath saved thee.

Here, we see Jesus healing someone based upon the faith of their loved ones, be they friends or family:
Matthew 9
King James Version (KJV)
1 And he entered into a ship, and passed over, and came into his own city. 2 And, behold, they brought to him a man sick of the palsy, lying on a bed: and Jesus seeing their faith said unto the sick of the palsy; Son, be of good cheer; thy sins be forgiven thee. 3 And, behold, certain of the scribes said within themselves, This man blasphemeth. 4 And Jesus knowing their thoughts said, Wherefore think ye evil in your hearts? 5 For whether is easier, to say, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and walk? 6 But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (then saith he to the sick of the palsy,) Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house. 7 And he arose, and departed to his house.

I love that verse because it shows that Jesus washes away sins based upon the faith of one's loved ones and friends.

And here, we see that Jesus healed the woman's daughter based upon the mother's faith, not upon the daughter's. 
Matthew 15:21-28
King James Version (KJV)
21 Then Jesus went thence, and departed into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon.


22 And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.


23 But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.


24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.


25 Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.


26 But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.


27 And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.


28 Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.

baptism is a sign of what God has already done, which is made us new creations in Christ.
Baptism is the vehicle through which God washes our sins away by water. Just as He washed away the illness of Naaman:
2 Kings 5:14

King James Version (KJV)

14 Then went he down, and dipped himself seven times in Jordan, according to the saying of the man of God: and his flesh came again like unto the flesh of a little child, and he was clean.

Sincerely,

De Maria

Friday, June 5, 2015

Baptism leaves an indelible mark



PB:On another thread a Catholic said that a satanist if originally baptized in the Catolic Church remains a Catholic even after becoming a devil worshipper.  I guess that would go for an atheist too.  What I don't understand is when a Christian [fully believing Jesus is Saviour and the Son of the living GOD] is excommunicated.  One is denouncing GOD, the Church, everything Jesus taught..  The other is only denouncing the Pope - possibly his authority, teachings from Sacred Tradition [meaning those not fully supported by Scripture], etc.
kb:I agree. Baptism puts an indelible mark on the soul and it can't be undone no matter what one does.
PB:Indelible mark on the satanists soul, but not on the reformers soul?
SW:Beats the devil out of me how they come up these answers.
Beats me how Protestants comprehend the written word.



PB:Indelible mark on the satanists soul, but not on the reformers soul?

KB:On the soul of anyone who receives a Trinitarian Baptism. Catholic, Reformed, Baptist, Lutheran, Independent, Congregational, etc.
PB:OK!  What exactly does this indelible mark do for the satanist?
Have you not read in Scripture?

2 Peter 2:

King James Version (KJV)

19 While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.
20 For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning.


Matthew 12:43-45

King James Version (KJV)

43 When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest, and findeth none.
44 Then he saith, I will return into my house from whence I came out; and when he is come, he findeth it empty, swept, and garnished.
45 Then goeth he, and taketh with himself seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first. Even so shall it be also unto this wicked generation.


Sincerely,

De Maria

Thursday, June 4, 2015

Baptism now saves


FH:
Yep, that is what Christians do....they are baptized as a sign of their salvation....
A sign and more:
Acts 22:16
And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, andwash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.

I would prefer you follow God too....but you don't, you follow an apostate religious organzation, and depend on what YOU do to be saved....that is not of God.

I follow God. You follow the Apostates.

Sincerely,

De Maria

Wednesday, June 3, 2015

Therefore, He established a Church upon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets and continues to send workers to His field, even today.

#818 cont'd  From "The Immaculate Conception in Scripture", pg 9 
ED SAYS, "There are two kinds of tongues. Tongues that we initiate to edify ourselves by praying in the Holy Spirit (1Cor.14:2-4) , and tongues, which God does the initiating by choosing a person in a worship service and speaks through that person, to get His message to them, and most of the time, uses another person to interpret it. That's what Paul means, "do we all speak in tongues? do all interpret?" ---- By the way, that's how God led the early church (1Cor.14:26). 
You need to read the lives of the Saints. It is in the Saints that all the gifts of the Holy Spirit are shown in their fullness. All of you who contradict Scripture while speaking in tongues, are simply showing that you are guided by another spirit:
2 Corinthians 11:14 Yet I am not surprised! Satan can change himself into an angel of light, 15 so it is no wonder his servants can do it too, and seem like godly ministers. In the end they will get every bit of punishment their wicked deeds deserve.
There wasn't any need for apostolic succession etc.. 
There wasn't any need for Scripture, either. Nor for men, even. But God does His will because it is His good pleasure. Therefore, He established a Church upon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets and continues to send workers to His field, even today.
God's representatives on earth is the Holy Spirit and the Bible. 
The Bible says that God's representatives on earth are men of the Church:
2 Corinthians 5:20Living Bible (TLB)
20 We are Christ’s ambassadors. God is using us to speak to you: we beg you, as though Christ himself were here pleading with you, receive the love he offers you—be reconciled to God.
In the Old Testament God led the Jews through the Holy Spirited prophets and His Word.
Get a clue. That is the shadow of the New Testament. Today, He guides Christians through the Holy Spirited priests in His Church and His Word in Tradition and Scripture.
ED SAYS, "My advise to you, is, you better take heed to what you are saying, because there is NO SCRIPTURE, indicating that the Holy Spirit is being outpoured by water baptism. NONE! 
I've already shown you several times. Read above.
You try to make it to be so by quoting (Acts 2:38) or (1Pet. 3:21) but in both cases, baptism does NOT stand alone, they both include belief in Christ. 
Duh! Who said that Baptism stands alone?
There is NO SCRIPTURE in the Bible that indicates that anyone received the Holy Spirit by water baptized by its self. NONE!
Are you just now understanding that?
ED SAYS, "Your full of it! What do you think my pastor and his hand picked Bible instructors do? 
You submit to them and confess your sins to them? And you acknowledge that they beseech you in God's stead and pray for you in place of Christ?
2 Corinthians 5:20 We are Christ’s ambassadors. God is using us to speak to you: ....
If you believe this, then why do you reject the Sacrament of penance (Confession)?
And they are sober when they teach and watch over us. My cousin once, invited me to a Catholic men's dinner. Present, were all the most notorious gamblers, and hoods of the town.
Matthew 9:10 And it came to pass, as Jesus sat at meat in the house, behold, many publicans and sinners came and sat down with him and his disciples. 11 And when the Pharisees saw it, they said unto his disciples, Why eateth your Master with publicans and sinners?
While there, I ran into Tom, one of my Catholic grade school buddies, he was very proud of one of the priest who was so drunk, that he had to lean against the wall to hold him upright. Tom, said to me, "He's one of us Ed, he drinks somewhat too, like us. Is that what you mean by watching over your souls?
No. Here's what I mean:
John 20:23Living Bible (TLB)
23 If you forgive anyone’s sins, they are forgiven. If you refuse to forgive them, they are unforgiven.”
ED SAID, "He (H.S.) came into my life, simply by my believing in what Jesus did for me on the cross.
If the Holy Spirit had come into your life, you would be Catholic. That is not the Holy Spirit which is leading you against Christ and His Church.
I was later baptized in a lake to show my repentance and to fulfill the act of righteousness as Jesus tells us too (Mat.3:15) (Mat.21:32).
You were baptized in a lake to fool you into believing that you were repenting. But it is not repentance to remain against the Institution which Jesus Christ established to lead you to Him:
Matthew 18:17 If he still refuses to listen, then take your case to the church, and if the church’s verdict favors you, but he won’t accept it, then the church should excommunicate him.[a]
ED SAYS, "Juan, you are an embarrassment to some of the fine Catholics on this blog. Do you see the above Scripture that I had posted (Mat.21:32) this is what Jesus said, "John came to you to show you righteousness, (baptism)
First, that is not the verse we were discussing. Here is that verse:
Matthew 3:13-15Living Bible (TLB)
13 Then Jesus went from Galilee to the Jordan River to be baptized there by John. 14 John didn’t want to do it. “This isn’t proper,” he said. “I am the one who needs to be baptized by you.” 15 But Jesus said, “Please do it, for I must do all that is right.”[a] So then John baptized him.
Notice how Jesus does it to fulfill righteousness. Whereas, we do it to be washed of sins. Jesus had not sins which needed to be washed.
Second, you have again added words to the Scripture, Matt 21:32, even in your bible, says:
Matthew 21:32Living Bible (TLB)
32 For John the Baptist told you to repent and turn to God, and you wouldn’t, while very evil men and prostitutes did. And even when you saw this happening, you refused to repent, and so you couldn’t believe.
Therefore, the way of righteousness for us, is repentance. But Christ had no sins from which to repent.
1 Peter 2:22Living Bible (TLB)
22 He never sinned, never told a lie,
(Mat.21:32) this is what Jesus said, "John came to you to show you righteousness, (baptism) and you did not believe him, but the tax collectors and the prostitutes did. And even after you saw this, you did not repent and believe him." ----- I know that Jesus was sinless, and there wasn't any need for Him to repent, but He got water baptized in order to set an example to show us what we must do to repent.
Well now you're getting warm. However, Jesus also said:
Mark 16:16Living Bible (TLB)
16 Those who believe and are baptized will be saved. But those who refuse to believe will be condemned.
An act of righteousness, that's what the above Scriptures mean.
You already acknowledged that I am correct when you said:
I know that Jesus was sinless, and there wasn't any need for Him to repent
Thank you.
ED SAYS, "JUAN, do you realize what you just said,
Yes.
I'm quoting Scripture, (Rom.10:17) "Faith comes by hearing the message." 
Correct.
So now you know more that God, who wrote those words???" 
Ed! That's what I said. I said that faith comes before Baptism. I didn't say that faith comes before hearing the message. Scripture says:
Romans 10:14Living Bible (TLB)
14 But how shall they ask him to save them unless they believe in him? And how can they believe in him if they have never heard about him? And how can they hear about him unless someone tells them?
Yet, your words, "Faith comes before Baptism." which is nowhere to be found in the Bible.
Its everywhere in Scripture, Ed. Why would anyone who does not believe in Christ want to be baptized?
JUAN SAYS, "You're not a Jehovah. Then why did you mention a Kingdom hall?
ED SAYS, "So according to your cock-eyed logic, anytime someone mentions "Kingdom hall," he then, automatically becomes a Jehovah's Witness. Juan, do you know what this stands for (?<*&^%$#??)
I don't care.
ED SAYS, "20 years??? It can't be! By what you post and your abuse of the Scriptures, honestly! I thought at most you were between 8 and 10 years old, by calling me a liar etc. when you had no reason whatsoever to do so.
Ed, I said that you lied because you posted a lie.
You see Juan, you are spitting in God's face when you twist the Scriptures to your own likings, and make dishonest statements such as, "no one can know that he/she has the Holy Spirit without being water baptized." That kind of a statement is straight from the devil's mouth. As I have proved you WRONG by the Cornelius' episode. I have every right to go after you in the manner as I do, since you appear to be one of Wolves that Paul cautioned us about (Acts 20:29).
You have proved that you are wrong by all which you have said here. 
One does NOT get the Holy Spirit by water baptism,
Scripture says so. You are merely denying Scripture.
that's why you can't understand me, and that's why you abuse Scripture to your own likings. According to (1Cor.2:14) "The man without the SPIRIT does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to Him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned."
That describes you, Ed.
That's why you erroneously say, that unless a person is water baptized he/she wouldn't know that they have the Holy Spirit. Not only is that FALSE according to the Scriptures, but it's laughable to those people who know that they have the Holy Spirit by the change in their lives (2Cor.5:17) and by speaking in tongues (Mark 16:17). What happened to you when you got water baptized, is that you got wet and deceived.
No, Ed. It is you who are deceived. As has been proven over and over.

God Bless,
ED O.
P.S. Matthew, don't go away too far, we had a very good debate going, until Juan, came busting in. I'm not planning on spending too much more time with him.

You goin' somewhere?

Tuesday, June 2, 2015

You deny these things because you can't see them.

#818 cont'd  From "The Immaculate Conception in Scripture", pg 9 
ED SAYS, "How dare you say that I LIE,
Oh, so you travel back in time? Maybe you ought to make a movie about that? Oh, right, that's already been done.
It's you trying to convince me to believe something that's not TRUE. The people in the Bible never believed in transubstantiation, since there were no ordained priests to transubstantiate the elements, so why should I believe in a hoax ????
If it were a hoax, Scripture wouldn't take it seriously.
Also you can NOT possibly believe in transubstantiation either, since you can't see, nor taste, feel or smell any change.
What does Scripture say:
2 Corinthians 5:7 We know these things are true by believing, not by seeing.
Not you though. You deny these things because you can't see them. You don't believe in anything that you can't see, taste, feel or smell.
You believe in what someone told you that it's being changed, if you weren't told, you wouldn't have any idea whatsoever that it has been changed.
True. Again, Scirpture says:
Romans 10:14Living Bible (TLB)
14 But how shall they ask him to save them unless they believe in him? And how can they believe in him if they have never heard about him? And how can they hear about him unless someone tells them?
ED SAYS, "When you haven't a rebuttal, you then simply say that I LIE, BUT YOU NEVER SHOW HOW. 
Well, I understand your objection in context of what you've said. And you said:
ED SAYS, you ask me "Where do you get Jesus blood?" That's a question, I should be asking you. (Heb.9:26-28) states, "Then Christ would have had to suffer many times (Masses) since the creation of the world. But now He has appeared ONCE for all at the end of the ages to do AWAY with sin by His sacrifice of Himself."
And that is not what it means to offer the once for all, Sacrifice of Christ.
What catechism (1367) teaches, is, when a Mass is offered on Sunday and again on Monday and Tuesday etc. you are RE-SACRIFICING Christ at every Mass. At a Mass, in some mysterious way called transubstantiation, the actual BLOOD of Jesus, is being produced in the Eucharist. 
Correct. And you reject the Blood of Christ. You reject the Mass. Therefore, how do you escape the curses of Heb 10:22-31?
Then that same actual BLOOD, again, in some mysterious way becomes UNBLOODY in the Mass.
It is in the guise of wine.
Together with the actual BLOOD of the Eucharist and the UNBLOODY of the Mass they become ONE sacrifice. It is repeated over and over again daily. THAT'S AN OXYMORON! Blood and Unbloody both at the same time. Yet, they are One??? That's exactly what you are believing!
Unbloody doesn't mean without blood. It means that it doesn't look like blood. 
ED SAYS, " NO REBUTTAL so you claim that I LIE.
I have rebutted thoroughly. Just as you don't care what Scripture say, you don't care what the Catechism says and you don't care what I or any of the other people on this blog say.
SHOW ME HOW AM I DOING SO??? Concerning the breaking of bread which you call the Eucharist, (1Cor.11:24-26) Very clearly says, do it in REMEMBRANCE and when we do it we PROCLAIM and not SACRIFICE the Lord's death.
Answered above.
I'm hitting you right smack it the eye with Scripture TRUTH, is that what you can't stand, so you FALSELY accuse me of LYING, yet never once do you show me how?
No Ed. I'm smacking you in the eyes with the Scripture truth. You can't see it because you're spiritually blind.
ED SAYS, "Why are you showing me (Mat.26:27), That was the Last Supper before He died. After His resurrection, THERE IS NO MORE BLOOD OF JESUS ANYWHERE ANYMORE. It's you who is all screwed up by believing in transubstantiation.
It is the Last Supper before He was crucified. But not the Last Supper. We obey Him and continue to celebrate His Supper in remembrance of His Sacrifice for our salvation:
Luke 22:19 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.
ED SAYS, "That's true, when you believe that was done 2000 years ago.
And we still offer it today, because we obey Jesus' command.
ED SAYS, "You can show that Scripture until, you are blue in the face,
And you will refuse to believe it.
and I'll tell to read a little further to v63, where Jesus very clearly says, "The words I have spoken are spirit and life," 
Explaining that His words are absolutely true.
When you take (John 6:56-58) in a literal sense, you then run into all kinds of problems. A] verse 63 says you are wrong, B] (1Cor.11:24-26) says you are wrong,
1 Corinthians 11:24 And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.25 After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, this cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.26 For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come.
On the contrary, that shows you are wrong.
C] (Luke 22:19) says you are wrong, 
Luke 22:19 And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.
Again, that proves you wrong. And proves that you don't believe the Word of God.
D] (1Cor.15:50) says you are wrong, NO blood in heaven.
1 Corinthians 15:50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.
That simply says that we will be spiritual beings when we enter the Kingdom of God. 
E] (Luke 24:36) you are wrong, NO blood in Jesus, and the list goes on and on.
Luke 24:36King James Version (KJV)
36 And as they thus spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.
That doesn't say that there is no blood in heaven as you claim. In fact, if there is a natural body, there is a spiritual body. and a natural body contains blood. Therefore, a spiritual body must contain spiritual blood:
Luke 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.
He has flesh and bones. And flesh contains blood.
ED SAYS," It's you that has no faith in Jesus, you are putting your faith in a substance called water,
What a ridiculous thing to say. I drink water daily. Yet I don't worship that water. It is in Jesus Christ that I place my faith. Therefore, I have faith that HE, by the action of the Holy Spirit, washed my sins when I was baptized.
rather than in the source called Jesus. He made the rules and not some fallible men in a church meeting.
It is because I believe He made the rules that I believe those fallible men could write the Scriptures infallibly and continue to make infallible decisions. I believe Jesus is the Head of the Catholic Church, therefore I believe the Catholic Church is infallible.
But you don't believe that your group is guided by either Christ or by the Holy Spirit, or you would believe that they are infallible. Either that or you don't believe that Christ or the Holy Spirit are infallible.
ED SAYS, "Yes, I know that it's ONE of the gifts, however; it's the ONE GIFT EVERYBODY gets when they are baptized in the Holy Spirit.
That's not true.
1 Corinthians 12:30-31Living Bible (TLB)
30 Can everyone heal the sick? Of course not. Does God give all of us the ability to speak in languages we’ve never learned? Can just anyone understand and translate what those are saying who have that gift of foreign speech? 31 No, but try your best to have the more important of these gifts.
By the way Juan, that's one of the ways a person knows that he has the Holy Spirit, contrary to what you FALSELY claim that it's only by water baptism. Tongues, started with the 120 people in (Acts 2:4),
Notice that only those who preached were speaking in tongues. Not the newly baptized. Read all of Acts 2.
with the people in (Acts 8:16), with Paul ( Acts 9:17--1Cor.14:18) with Cornelius (Acts 10:44) with disciples in (Acts 19:6), to believers who pray in the Spirit (Eph.6:18) and we are to pray in the Spirit (Jude 20). You can't do it, when you haven't received the H.S.in water baptism.
Whether I can do it, God knows. But you are no one to judge what I can or can't do. You can't read hearts. Not even your own.
Jesus, Himself, also says so (Mark16:17-18) "And these signs will accompany those who believe: in my name they will drive out demons; they WILL speak in new tongues, v18, they will pick up snakes with their hands; (that happened to Paul in (Acts 28:3-5) and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on the sick people, and they will get well."
Can you do all those things?
Do I speak in tongues? YES! Do I pick up snakes? NO! We are not to put God to any foolish tests.
If you understood the Scripture, you would know that the Catholic Church meets all those descriptions. That verse is a reference to the Saints of the Catholic Church, who, throughout Church history have performed many miracles. Even some greater than that which Jesus Christ did. Yeaaaaah. You haven't read or understood the Scripture. Jesus said:
John 14:12Living Bible (TLB)
12-13 “In solemn truth I tell you, anyone believing in me shall do the same miracles I have done, and even greater ones,.... 
But should I encounter such a situation, I'll do what Paul did, shake the snake off, and rely on what Jesus promises here. Do I drink poison ? NO! But should I accidently do so, I'll rely on what Jesus promises here. Do I heal the sick? NO! I haven't thus far, But should Jesus put me in such a position, I'll rely on what He promises here. But everybody gets *tongues.*
Scripture contradicts you:
1 Corinthians 12:30-31Living Bible (TLB)
30 Can everyone heal the sick? Of course not. Does God give all of us the ability to speak in languages we’ve never learned? Can just anyone understand and translate what those are saying who have that gift of foreign speech? 31 No, but try your best to have the more important of these gifts.
ED SAYS, " Who are you to claim, that one of God's gift is better than another???? That's asinine!
Scripture says so, Ed.
1 Corinthians 12:31
Living Bible
No, but try your best to have the more important of these gifts. First, however, let me tell you about something else that is better than any of them!
Yes! I just showed you above, when a person is baptized with the Holy Spirit THEY WILL ALL SPEAK IN TONGUES.
No, Ed. You are reading into Scripture. 
The only ones that don't are the people who don't believe in tongues, and never made any effort to receive it by the laying of hands. So many make all kinds of lame excuses against it. In my 29 years in Catholicism, never once have I heard anyone speak in tongues. Juan, have you heard anyone in your church?
No. We have orderly proceedings and follow the advice of the Apostle:
1 Cor 14:18 I thank God that I “speak in tongues” privately[b] more than any of the rest of you. 19 But in public worship I would much rather speak five words that people can understand and be helped by than ten thousand words while “speaking in tongues” in an unknown language.

Monday, June 1, 2015

Notice how these folks had not received the Holy Spirit, even though they claimed to believe (Acts 19:1).

#814 Edward Osiecki - Fort Mill, South Carolina
To Juan and ALL, except demon experienced Christopher, who communicates with himself and Debbie, his cheerleader.
ED SAYS,...YET, JUAN, ignores, Paul's teachings in (1Cor. 5:12) "What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? v13 God will judge those outside. "Expel the wicked man from among you."--- When Christopher claims to be saved, he's inside the church, so IT IS my job to judge him accordingly.
On the contrary, Ed. It is we who should expel, you. You are the one who is outside the Church. You are the one who is identified as the heretic. You are the one who is against the Catholic Church and being against the Catholic Church, are against Christ, who established her and sent her into the world to proclaim the Gospel.
Juan, when you take a verse out of its context, you can get the Bible to say anything. 
You should know. You do it regularly.
(Mat.27:5) "Judas went and hanged himself." (Luke 10:37) "Go and do likewise," WAKE UP JUAN!
It is you who are like the blind being led by the blind, Protestants. Open your eyes before you fall into that everlasting lake of fire.
ED SAYS, "How dare you accuse me of lying.
Ed, you're lying. Plain and simple. 
I gave you the source (Public Broadcasting System,
Is the Public Broadcasting System in Scripture? And yet, you believe them. Therefore you don't go by Scripture alone but by every wind of doctrine and every fable of man made tradition.
where it can be found "The Secrets of the Inquisition." I also have a DVD recorded right from that program its self. Julian Hernandez death for smuggling Bibles is recorded in history. YOU SUPPLIED NOTHING, YET YOU ACCUSE ME OF LYING.
You are deluded by the evil of this world. You are passing along their lies as if you know something. Therefore, yes, you are lying.
ED SAYS, "Another abuse of the Scriptures! Forget (Eph.3:10) and (1Tim.3:15) those Scriptures have nothing to do with what's being said. 
They have everything to do with it, Ed. You claim to believe Scripture, but you twist the meaning out of those in order to support your anti-biblical beliefs.
You are using those Scriptures in order to avoid what I'm saying, which is, your Catholic catechism in (#1411) very clearly states that only an ordained priest can change the bread and wine by transubstantiation, which is FALSE!.
It is true, Ed. Here's another Bible verse which you contradict.
John 21:25 And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen.
Not everything has to be written in the Bible, Ed.
But I know that you don't believe the Bible. I post these verses for the edification of any who do believe the Bible.
Those people in (Acts 2:42-47) just got saved. They then met in their homes, prayed and broke bread which you call the Eucharist, 
As the Scripture says:
John 6:51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
BUT THERE WERE NO ORDAINED PRIESTS AMONG THEM,
All the Apostles were priests ordained by God and they, in turn, ordained more:
1 Timothy 4:14 Neglect not the gift that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery.
to transubstantiate the elements. So the church that you profess to teach Wisdom is LYING.
So, you contradict the Word of God which says that the Church teaches the Wisdom of God (Eph 3:10).
ED SAID, "If you call the sinful despicable actions of so many of the Popes, the Wisdom of God, it's no wonder you think as you do."
Here you prove that you don't follow Scripture. Because Scripture says that the Church will not fall (Matt 16:18). And Scripture says that the office of Peter will feed His Church (John 21:17). And that Peter will strengthen His brethren:
Luke 22:30 That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom, and sit on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel. 31 And the Lord said, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat: 32 But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.
But again, you prove that you don't believe the Word of God.
ED SAYS," They list only the TEN WORST ONES, I refrain from posting them in order not to embarrass you and others by what they have done."
What they have "allegedly" done. Were you there and did you see them do anything? No. But you believe these stories. Therefore, you have allied yourself with the enemy of Christ's Church. And you have proven that you don't follow Scripture at all, much less Scripture alone, since you obey the traditions of men and wild fables of the enemies of Christ's Church.
ED SAYS, "That's blasphemy! 
You are the one blaspheming. It is you who does not believe the Holy Spirit can do anything anymore. It is you who deny God's power to work through His Church, the men of the Church and through water.
Priest's word brings about absolutely NOTHING! There aren't any ordained priests mentioned in the New Testament, NONE! God's earthly priesthood system ended with Jesus at the cross. The Temple's curtain, the entrance to the Most Holy Place, ripped in two (Luke 23:45) indicating the end of the priesthood system
Indicating the end of the Old Covenant. But remember that Moses established his system based upon that which he saw upon the Mountain:
Hebrews 8:5 Who serve unto the example and shadow of heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, that thou make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in the mount.
And upon the Mountain, he saw the heavenly Jerusalem which has priests. That is why the Old Covenant has priests. Therefore, the new Jerusalem which is the Catholic Church, also has priests. Because the new Jerusalem is joined to the heavenly Jerusalem:
Hebrews 12:21 And so terrible was the sight, that Moses said, I exceedingly fear and quake:) 22 But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels, 23 To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect, 24 And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel.
ED SAYS, "the washing of the water, is not literal water. It's a metaphor, there's no actual water involved in that Scripture.
It is real water which signifies and brings about the washing of the Holy Spirit in our soul.
ED SAYS, " Here's Juan, LYING AGAIN, claiming that I deliberately left out a verse to deceive. That episode starts with verse 17 and ends with verse 19, exactly what I have posted above.
It ends with v. 18, which you left out.
ED CONT. "He then was water baptized to show his repentance by confessing away his sins.
Scripture interprets Scripture, Ed. 
Acts 22:16 And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.
He was baptized in order that his sins would be washed away. Baptism by water brings about the washing of the Holy Spirit.
ED SAYS, "That came out of your HEAD, there is NO Scripture to support that statement. 
Baptism means "to wash". Acts 22:16 And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.
But here's my Scripture proof, John the Baptist was baptizing (Mat.3:5-6) people came from that whole region, v6 "Confessing their sins, they were baptized by him in the Jordan River."
Here's how you are disproved:
Acts 19:1 And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples, 2 He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost.
Notice how these folks had not received the Holy Spirit, even though they claimed to believe. That disproves your doctrine. It is not by faith alone.
3 And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism.
4 Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus.
St. Paul mused that it is true that St. John's baptism was unto repentance. But St. John's baptism was not effective for bringing about the gift of the Holy Spirit.
So, here we have two baptisms. The Baptism of John, which was not according to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. And the Baptism of Jesus, which is according to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. John's baptism of water did not bring about the baptism of the Holy Spirit in the heart. But Christ's baptism, did and continues to do so.
5 When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
6 And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied.
Now, this probably confuses you. What St. Paul did here is to give them two Sacraments. He baptized them and confirmed them at the same time. The way we do today to those who undergo RCIA. They receive the Holy Spirit in both Sacraments.
ED SAID, "Paul's sins were already forgiven and atoned for by his belief in Jesus when he called Jesus Lord. He was saved and forgiven before He even got near any water to be baptized.
No, Ed. See above. Belief alone does not bring about the forgiveness of sins nor the gift of the Holy Spirit. One must be baptized into Christ.
ED SAYS, " Another LIE coming from your own HEAD. Here's my Scripture proof. When Jesus called Paul and knocked him down, (Acts 9:4-5) and said, "Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me" v5 "who are you *LORD*? Saul asked.---- Paul In (1Cor.12:3) says, "no one can say, 'Jesus is *LORD*' except by the Holy Spirit."
What does this say, Ed?
Matthew 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.
Those men called Jesus, Lord. And it is only by the Holy Spirit that one can call Jesus, Lord. Now, you claim to know Scripture, what happened to them? 
When Paul called Jesus *LORD* he was saved, his sins were forgiven, he had received the Holy Spirit by simply belief in Jesus and by calling Him *LORD*. 
We've gone through this. Simply calling Jesus, Lord, does not save. Answer the question I asked above. What happened t those men who called Jesus, Lord? (Matt 7:21).
Jesus wasn't concerned about Paul's sins, Jesus said to Saul (Acts 9:6), "Now get up and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do." 
What was he told to do?
Acts 22:12 And one Ananias, a devout man according to the law, having a good report of all the Jews which dwelt there, 13 Came unto me, and stood, and said unto me, Brother Saul, receive thy sight. And the same hour I looked up upon him. 14 And he said, The God of our fathers hath chosen thee, that thou shouldest know his will, and see that Just One, and shouldest hear the voice of his mouth. 15 For thou shalt be his witness unto all men of what thou hast seen and heard.
16 And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.
Saul/Paul was predestined before he was even born (Rom.8:29), "For those God forknew he also PREDESTINED to be conformed to the likeness of His Son. 
So, God isn't all knowing? Does God only foreknow some, but not others? Who is made in the image of God? 
Genesis 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: ....
When Paul went to see Ananias (9:17-19) He went there to be healed (scales fell off his eyes) and to be Baptized (Filled) with the Holy Spirit by Ananias' laying of his hands on Paul, and to receive the gift of tongues. In (Acts 26:16-18) Paul gives an account how he was being commissioned. AND YOU SAY THAT HE WOULD HAVE BEEN LOST?????? YOU ARE A FALSE PROPHET! When you show no Scripture proof of what you say.
If he had refused to be baptized, he would have been lost. I have shown you the Scripture, again and again. You reject it as do your Protestant brethren:
Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
ED SAYS, "It very clearly says, that Christ would have to SUFFER. That's what He did ONCE and FOR ALL.
Thank you! The sacrifice which He offered once, we participate in that one sacrifice TODAY. 
ED SAYS, "The word sacrifice shouldn't be mentioned with the breaking of bread which you call the Eucharist. 
It is the Sacrifice of Thanksgiving which Melchizedek prefigured many centuries prior:
Genesis 14:17 And the king of Sodom went out to meet him after his return from the slaughter of Chedorlaomer, and of the kings that were with him, at the valley of Shaveh, which is the king's dale. 18 And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God. 19 And he blessed him, and said, Blessed be Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth:
Genesis 31:54 Then Jacob offered sacrifice upon the mount, and called his brethren to eat bread: and they did eat bread, and tarried all night in the mount.
Leviticus 7:12 If he offer it for a thanksgiving, then he shall offer with the sacrifice of thanksgiving unleavened cakes mingled with oil, and unleavened wafers anointed with oil, and cakes mingled with oil, of fine flour, fried.
The living Bible in (1Cor.10:14-16) states, "So, dear friends, carefully avoid idol-worship of every kind" Which is what you are doing when you make the Host an idol and place it into a monstrance and genuflect to it.
Read further:
15 You are intelligent people. Look now and see for yourselves whether what I am about to say is true. 16 When we ask the Lord’s blessing upon our drinking from the cup of wine at the Lord’s Table, this means, doesn’t it, that all who drink it are sharing together the blessing of Christ’s blood? And when we break off pieces of the bread from the loaf to eat there together, this shows that we are sharing together in the benefits of his body. 17 No matter how many of us there are, we all eat from the same loaf, showing that we are all parts of the one body of Christ. 18 And the Jewish people, all who eat the sacrifices, are united by that act.
19 What am I trying to say? Am I saying that the idols to whom the heathen bring sacrifices are really alive and are real gods, and that these sacrifices are of some value? No, not at all. 20 What I am saying is that those who offer food to these idols are united together in sacrificing to demons, certainly not to God. And I don’t want any of you to be partners with demons when you eat the same food, along with the heathen, that has been offered to these idols. 21 You cannot drink from the cup at the Lord’s Table and at Satan’s table, too. You cannot eat bread both at the Lord’s Table and at Satan’s table.
St. Paul is distinguishing between the idol worship of the pagans and the true worship of the Eucharist in the Catholic Church.
The 2nd Commandment prohibits idols and bowing down to them.
True.
v16 "When we ask the Lord's blessing upon our drinking from the cup of wine at the Lord's table, this means, doesn't it, that all who dink it are sharing together the blessing of Christ's Blood? And when we break off pieces of the bread from the loaf to eat there together, this shows that we are sharing together in the benefits of His body."
Read further:
23 You are certainly free to eat food offered to idols if you want to; it’s not against God’s laws to eat such meat, but that doesn’t mean that you should go ahead and do it. 
Nothing will happen to you, good or bad, if you eat the meat offered to idols. But now keep reading:
23 For this is what the Lord himself has said about his Table, and I have passed it on to you before: That on the night when Judas betrayed him, the Lord Jesus took bread, 24 and when he had given thanks to God for it, he broke it and gave it to his disciples and said, “Take this and eat it. This is my body, which is given[e] for you. Do this to remember me.” 25 In the same way, he took the cup of wine after supper, saying, “This cup is the new agreement between God and you that has been established and set in motion by my blood. Do this in remembrance of me whenever you drink it.” 26 For every time you eat this bread and drink this cup you are retelling the message of the Lord’s death, that he has died for you. Do this until he comes again.
27 So if anyone eats this bread and drinks from this cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner, he is guilty of sin against the body and the blood of the Lord. 28 That is why a man should examine himself carefully before eating the bread and drinking from the cup. 29 For if he eats the bread and drinks from the cup unworthily, not thinking about the body of Christ and what it means, he is eating and drinking God’s judgment upon himself; for he is trifling with the death of Christ. 
If the bread and cup were mere idol worship, nothing would happen to us. That is according to the Teaching of Scripture. But it is the true Body and true Blood of Christ. Those who partake of this Sacrament but do not believe in it, will die because they have blasphemed the Body of Christ and the Blood which sanctified them.
But, now, what will happen to those, who like all Protestants, refuse to partake even in the celebration of the Eucharist? Let's go to another book for that answer:
Hebrews 10:21 And since this great High Priest of ours rules over God’s household, 22 let us go right in to God himself, with true hearts fully trusting him to receive us because we have been sprinkled with Christ’s blood to make us clean and because our bodies have been washed with pure water.
Oh look! A description of baptism which says that when we are washed with pure water we are actually washed in Christ's blood. Hm. I'd better file this one in my memory banks. 
But I actually wanted to show you what follows:
25 Let us not neglect our church meetings,
We call that the Mass. He says, don't neglect to meet together for the Mass. Why? He'll tell us next.
as some people do, but encourage and warn each other, especially now that the day of his coming back again is drawing near.
26 If anyone sins deliberately by rejecting the Savior after knowing the truth of forgiveness, this sin is not covered by Christ’s death; there is no way to get rid of it. 
Because neglecting to meet together for the Mass is the same thing as rejecting Christ's sacrifice. It amounts to a deliberate sin against Christ.
This is why missing the Mass is considered a mortal sin in the Catholic Church. Now, you see that you reject the Mass, wilfully and therefore, can you be saved? It is a very grave sin.
27 There will be nothing to look forward to but the terrible punishment of God’s awful anger, which will consume all his enemies. 
Those who miss the Mass are considered God's enemies.
28 A man who refused to obey the laws given by Moses was killed without mercy if there were two or three witnesses to his sin. 29 Think how much more terrible the punishment will be for those who have trampled underfoot the Son of God and treated his cleansing blood as though it were common and unhallowed,
Why is missing the Mass considered to be a trampling underfoot of the Son of God? Why is it considered to be an insult to the cleansing blood of Christ? 
Let's go back to 1 Cor 11:27 So if anyone eats this bread and drinks from this cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner, he is guilty of sin against the body and the blood of the Lord. 28 That is why a man should examine himself carefully before eating the bread and drinking from the cup. 29 For if he eats the bread and drinks from the cup unworthily, not thinking about the body of Christ and what it means, he is eating and drinking God’s judgment upon himself; for he is trifling with the death of Christ. 30 That is why many of you are weak and sick, and some have even died.
and insulted and outraged the Holy Spirit who brings God’s mercy to his people.
It is such a wicked sin that St. Paul equates it with the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit:
Mark 3:28 “I solemnly declare that any sin of man can be forgiven, even blasphemy against me; 29 but blasphemy against the Holy Spirit can never be forgiven. It is an eternal sin.”
You might want to go search for another Bible that doesn't teach Catholic Doctrine, Bucky. This one convicts you of blasphemy.
30 For we know him who said, “Justice belongs to me; I will repay them”; who also said, “The Lord himself will handle these cases.” 31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.
Mhm. Yep. This bible convicts you and all Protestants. Maybe you can find another more to your liking. One that Protestants have totally rewritten to mean something totally different than what Christ teaches. This one Teaches Catholic Doctrine.