You are desperately seeking to find something against the Catholic Church

Lutero:
Couldn't Jesus have meant that
if he wasn't utterly destroyed, killed and put to death,
you will have no life in you!

No. Jesus would not leave out His Resurrection. As He said to the Disciples:
Matthew 16:

King James Version (KJV)
²⁰ Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.
²¹ From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.

And we are called to remember that by breaking bread
and utterly destroying it be chewing and eating to think of Jesus.

We unite ourselves with Jesus when we eat of Him:

2 Peter 1:4

King James Version (KJV)
⁴ Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.

You may not like it as it is not Catholic,
but if you were honest you would have to admit that this makes sense.

I believe I'm honest and I know I'm Catholic and I still don't like it. Perhaps, if you were honest, you might admit that you are reaching because you are desperately seeking to find something against the Catholic Church.

That is exactly the point, we agree that it goes further

Your statement goes too far and adds error to the Word of God.

The Semitic idiom actually implies:
To “eat someone’s flesh,” does indeed mean what they say it does;
but it goes further than that. It also means to utterly destroy, to kill, to put to death.

The semitic idiom is used in the context of enemies who hate each other. Jesus is speaking to His disciples, whom He loves and for whom He is giving His life and thus affording them salvation from the Enemy who would utterly destroy them if he could.


Sincerely,

De Maria