Sunday, June 28, 2015

The Sacraments are all described in Scripture

LG: There are too many defects in your sacraments to put them all into one post.

If there were any at all, you would have mentioned at least one. But there are none, so you pretend.

Least of all that they are done by priests which are also not scriptural.
They are all in accordance with Scripture.

I have already addressed confirmation which is completely demonic.
You have addressed nothing but your errors. Here is the Sacrament of Confirmation in Scripture:

Acts 8:14-17

King James Version (KJV)

14 Now when the apostles which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John:
15 Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost:
16 (For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.)
17 Then laid they their hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost.

I don't have time now to write essays on the other 6 wrongs of your church.
The Catholic Church is infallible and has no wrongs. The Protestant Churches have 666 wrongs and more.

You also have not explained to me why you don't follow God's commandment to not bow in front of graven images when you say prayers to what the images represent.
Because that is not what God commanded. God did not want graven images worshipped as idols. We don't worship idols.

Do not quote me scripture for that because there is NO scripture that goes against what God says. God does not contradict Himself.
There is no Scripture that goes against what God said. But Protestant doctrine frequently goes against what God said.


De Maria

1 comment:

  1. LG SAID:"Least of all that they are done by priests which are also not scriptural."

    I've heard this tired old canard so many times it makes me wonder if they really do read the Scriptures. The very "line'" they use to refute the priesthood is contained within the very Epistle that describes and the priesthood.

    Here's a question I would like to ask pro-testants: If Jesus Christ is considered the High Priest, then how could He have been given the title "High" unless there was something lower in status?

    God Bless you De Maria!


Thanks for contributing.